Albanian and Sanskrit
It is up to the linguists and people who focus on their work to make an analysis of this work of the eminent translator in which he concludes that Albanian is older than Sanskrit.
For all those who in the '70s and' 80s kept the translator and Eurydice Petro Zheji as a spiritual leader, it is the opportunity to inform them that the second part of the work "Albanian and Sanskrit" has been released. Even for the general reader, whom Zheji does not exclude from the audience of lectures for this monologue debate, we can briefly inform that again the author deals with the truth that there is no doubt that Albanian is older than Sanskrit. For this he has expanded the glossary of comparisons and brings a number of examples of motivation through the Albanian of glosses Sanskrit. For example: preksya - visible. This word that with the mediation of Albanian is decomposed: touched with eyes.
Sanskrit is known as one of the oldest languages in the world, an ideo-European language, of the Indian branch that developed starting from the 5th century BC, and was one of the cornerstones of Brahmanical civilization and Vedic culture. Many Indian texts on science and mathematics have been written in this language. It is with this language that Zheji proves the affinity of Albanian and in the method he uses to analyze, etymology, philosophy and logic interact. Because it is these three from which language can be deprived of information on knowledge and realities that language preserves for centuries. "The problem of such antiquity also affects many problems such as that of the country occupied by the ancestors of the Albanians in Europe as well as a series of issues related to ancient culture, myths, mutual influences of peoples between them, etc.," says Petro. Zheji in the first part of "Albanian and Sanskrit" where from the beginning he calls wrong the conclusion of albanologists like Gustav Meyer on the origin of Albanian from relatively new languages such as Latin, Greek, Turkish, Slavic. He also refers to Jerome De Rada who gives us “a more or less clear vision of the spirit world of our forefathers. From the names of the gods he passes to the names of places, various objects, etc., relying on ancient works such as those of Homer, Herodotus, Pliny, etc. The view he gives us of the Pelasgian world is more or less complete and valid, in general, even to this day.
The conclusion that Zheji reaches with this study is this: the lexical system of the Albanian language is wider than that of the Sanskrit language, so it includes it and the Sanskrit language system is a subset of the community of the Albanian language system. This conclusion pushes Zheji to declare that it conforms to the spirit of our Renaissance on the Albanian language, because it clarifies their prophetic vision on an ancient antiquity of our language and people.
The two parts of this work are curated and accompanied by introductions by Zheji's relatives, Gjergj Zheji and Lluka Qafoku. The first defends this work as follows: "Philosophical-logical-etymological analyzes in this study are fully justified from the point of view of the Knowledge of our time, although not from the point of view of classical linguistics, where many linguists are still stuck." The second sees it as the discovery of a sui generis technology, to make them operative in the field of etymology, the genius discoveries of sign theory and the meaning of modern linguistics. This discovery, according to Qafoku, does not go beyond the framework of the efforts that have started since the beginning of the twentieth century and that see the problems of the origin of the word, also from the logical and psychological point of view.
So it is up to the linguists and people who have the word in the focus of their work to make an analysis of this work of the eminent translator and perhaps to learn more if the living legend of Albanian translation, Petro Zheji, has not entered a mined territory. Perhaps it is the same fertile territory where the hypotheses about the ancient gene of the origin of the Albanians and their language abound, and the same territory to which the claimants add that it belongs to the Homer bard, that is, the land of the Pelasgians.
These studies, as the author claims, should have been published here three decades ago. It took a long time to convince Zhej that his ideas are of this time and he needed them.
For all those who in the '70s and' 80s kept the translator and Eurydice Petro Zheji as a spiritual leader, it is the opportunity to inform them that the second part of the work "Albanian and Sanskrit" has been released. Even for the general reader, whom Zheji does not exclude from the audience of lectures for this monologue debate, we can briefly inform that again the author deals with the truth that there is no doubt that Albanian is older than Sanskrit. For this he has expanded the glossary of comparisons and brings a number of examples of motivation through the Albanian of glosses Sanskrit. For example: preksya - visible. This word that with the mediation of Albanian is decomposed: touched with eyes.
Sanskrit is known as one of the oldest languages in the world, an ideo-European language, of the Indian branch that developed starting from the 5th century BC, and was one of the cornerstones of Brahmanical civilization and Vedic culture. Many Indian texts on science and mathematics have been written in this language. It is with this language that Zheji proves the affinity of Albanian and in the method he uses to analyze, etymology, philosophy and logic interact. Because it is these three from which language can be deprived of information on knowledge and realities that language preserves for centuries. "The problem of such antiquity also affects many problems such as that of the country occupied by the ancestors of the Albanians in Europe as well as a series of issues related to ancient culture, myths, mutual influences of peoples between them, etc.," says Petro. Zheji in the first part of "Albanian and Sanskrit" where from the beginning he calls wrong the conclusion of albanologists like Gustav Meyer on the origin of Albanian from relatively new languages such as Latin, Greek, Turkish, Slavic. He also refers to Jerome De Rada who gives us “a more or less clear vision of the spirit world of our forefathers. From the names of the gods he passes to the names of places, various objects, etc., relying on ancient works such as those of Homer, Herodotus, Pliny, etc. The view he gives us of the Pelasgian world is more or less complete and valid, in general, even to this day.
The conclusion that Zheji reaches with this study is this: the lexical system of the Albanian language is wider than that of the Sanskrit language, so it includes it and the Sanskrit language system is a subset of the community of the Albanian language system. This conclusion pushes Zheji to declare that it conforms to the spirit of our Renaissance on the Albanian language, because it clarifies their prophetic vision on an ancient antiquity of our language and people.
The two parts of this work are curated and accompanied by introductions by Zheji's relatives, Gjergj Zheji and Lluka Qafoku. The first defends this work as follows: "Philosophical-logical-etymological analyzes in this study are fully justified from the point of view of the Knowledge of our time, although not from the point of view of classical linguistics, where many linguists are still stuck." The second sees it as the discovery of a sui generis technology, to make them operative in the field of etymology, the genius discoveries of sign theory and the meaning of modern linguistics. This discovery, according to Qafoku, does not go beyond the framework of the efforts that have started since the beginning of the twentieth century and that see the problems of the origin of the word, also from the logical and psychological point of view.
So it is up to the linguists and people who have the word in the focus of their work to make an analysis of this work of the eminent translator and perhaps to learn more if the living legend of Albanian translation, Petro Zheji, has not entered a mined territory. Perhaps it is the same fertile territory where the hypotheses about the ancient gene of the origin of the Albanians and their language abound, and the same territory to which the claimants add that it belongs to the Homer bard, that is, the land of the Pelasgians.
These studies, as the author claims, should have been published here three decades ago. It took a long time to convince Zhej that his ideas are of this time and he needed them.
